MZM, Virgil and Waldo

Filed under: Martinsville, economic dev — Badrose at 8:32 pm on Tuesday, February 6, 2007

MICKEY POWELL has written a piece in today’s Martinsville Bulletin about the amount of money that Martinsville may end up having to repay the Virginia Economic Development Partnership as the result of MZM, Inc. failing to meet 57% of its performance agreement.  Mickey’s article is seventeen paragraphs long, gives an in-depth look at how and why the moneys were appropriated and allocated and DOESN’T MENTION VIRGIL GOODE’S NAME ONCE.  Not once.  There is no mention of blaming Virgil or the suggestion that Virgil belongs in jail or speculation of wrongdoing.  For those “facts” you’ll need to read Waldo’s speculative blogs on the subject, as well as his far from polite comment section.

Nope, none - no mention of Virgil anywhere.  The General Counsel for the VEDP, John Sternlicht, however, did reiterate the fact that the city strongly desired the high-paying jobs that MZM/Athena offered and he stated the obvious, “I don’t think either the city or the state could ultimately have foreseen” the closing of the Clearview (Martinsville) facility.  I’ll take it a step further, I don’t think ANYONE, Virgil Goode included, could have foreseen how this deal would eventually go South or that some of the parties involved in the deal would go to jail.

I was a guest of the “MZM crowd” under their corporate tent at the Foxfield Races in the spring of 2005.  I met Mitch Wade and the others.  None of them looked or acted any differently than the bloggers I met at the Martinsville Blog Conference.  I would’ve felt completely comfortable accepting money from them, if only they had offered.  When Virgil learned that the money his campaign had accepted might be dirty, he donated it to worthy charities.  I believe at least one of those charities was an animal rescue group.  Only in WaldoWorld would this be seen as an admission of guilt.

Today’s Bulletin article is just the latest in a long string of articles covering the MZM/Virgil story.  For those of you who aren’t familiar with the Martinsville Bulletin, it is a family owned and operated newspaper as opposed to a corporate one such as Media General owned Richmond Times-Dispatch.  As such, the family that owns the Bulletin has control over the content.  Have I already mentioned that the family that owns the Bulletin is of the staunchly Democrat(ic) variety?  They are.  I know this because I’ve also partied (I was honored to hostess a Christmas party and a cookout for them at my home) with the Bulletin staff members and consider them to be friends of mine.  It can also be easily verified by seeing the names of the candidates to whom they contribute and endorse, the name and purpose of their charitable trust or just read their paper.  I’m not criticizing them by any means - if I owned a newspaper you better believe I’d use it to further my agenda.  I only mention the politics of the Bulletin to further establish my point that if there was dirt on Virgil, I know the Bulletin would be giddy at the prospect of reporting it.  My guess is that it would merit their largest headline yet!

From the comments over at WaldoWorld: (THIS one is polite)

Bubby  02/02/2007 3:03 pm #

I am familiar with the illegal contributions that Goode received. He was/is hanging by a thread for receiving those contributions and the reasonable assumption that they were in payment for his lobbying and committee votes. It ain’t over yet. In the drama of the Corrupt 109th Congress - Goode played a supporting role.

Goode’s constituents are faced with a question; is he stupid, is he a crook, or is he a little of both.

I am one of his constituents and my answer is “neither.” By this Bubby “logic,” I have to ask, is the Martinsville Bulletin, Roanoke Times, the federal investigators, Vanity Fair magazine or hundreds of others who have investigated this matter, are they all crooks?  Are they all stupid?  Both?

Virgil Goode might possibly be the cleanest member we have representing us in Congress.  Who else has withstood this level of scrutiny?  If he’s guilty of anything, then it’s a guilt shared by a great many of us who saw MZM as a much needed opportunity for this area.  An opportunity to fill a vacant shell building, to create jobs and most importantly, as leverage to lure other security/technology businesses to locate here.  The deals that were made to make this opportunity possible may seem out of the ordinary at first glance, although it was a good example of a collaborative effort between federal, state and local government and the private sector.  Just too bad that the private sector entity involved was crooked.

Let’s put the deal into perspective:  Recently it was announced that land near the town of Lenoir, NC had been chosen by Google as the site of its newest Web server farm facility.  This Google farm is projected to employ about 200 people.  What did North Carolina offer Google to land the “deal?”  One hundred and fifty acres, thirty years with no real estate taxes (which amounts to more than $100 million) PLUS a grant of $4.7 million.  In short, North Carolina is paying about $500,000 per job!

Does it sound like extortion or other mafia-type techniques were used in this NC deal?  This AP article pretty much says so.  Why did the lawmakers agree to these terms?  And then admit it?  Is the purpose of luring companies to our area lost in the competition with other localities?

Even without the benefit of this new perspective, I think the benefits of having MZM come to Martinsville in the first place far outweighed the risk.

6 Comments »

6

Comment by Waldo Jaquith

February 6, 2007 @ 9:05 pm

There is no mention of blaming Virgil or the suggestion that Virgil belongs in jail or speculation of wrongdoing. For those “facts” you’ll need to read Waldo’s speculative blogs on the subject, as well as his far from polite comment section.

Just to be clear: You’re blaming me for the comments that people leave on my site? If so, do you think that it would be better for me to delete comments if I don’t agree with them?

For the record, I’ve never suggested that Rep. Goode “belongs in jail,” or anything like that. I have been polite, forthright, and honest in every assessment that I’ve made of Rep. Goode and his legal situations, documenting every assertion and engaging in open discussion with those who disagree with me. I’ve always spoken of him with the respect due to a man of his office, and encouraged others to do the same. And, finally, I have periodically reminded my readers that his known character and reputation conflict with the appearance of impropriety that has surrounded his relationship with MZM. I’m not sure how much more you could ask of me.

7

Comment by Rowhey

February 6, 2007 @ 9:22 pm

Waldo,
Please do show me where you have backed any of your allegations with fact. Your assertions are long on assertions and short on fact.

8

Comment by Badrose

February 6, 2007 @ 9:49 pm

Just to be clear: No, I’m not. I’m simply directing people who want to read speculation as well as calls for Virgil to be jailed to your blogs and comments. None of us are responsible for the posts of others, you know that. Mark Brooks left the following comment on your site:

The restitutions you speak of; certainly you don’t think that there are only two people anywhere who would have had this idea. Myself, I would rather see a jail sentence for Mister Goode; failing that for the time being, restitution to Martinsville sounds like the honorable thing to do. Mark Brooks 02/04/2007 8:10 pm #14060
SOOOO . . as I said, IF people want to read drivel such as this, they can find it at your site, not in the Bulletin article. NOW they can read it here.

Personally, had someone left such a comment on my site, one calling for jail time for a person not even charged much less convicted, I would feel the need to rebuke that notion. But we can’t all be me, now can we?

Something else I’ve noticed about you, Waldo. I’ve never seen you leave positive or complimentary comments on the sites of other bloggers. I’m not saying that you haven’t left them, just that I haven’t seen them. You do, however, tend to comment when you apparently see the need for a “wrist slap.”

9

Comment by Waldo Jaquith

February 7, 2007 @ 5:18 pm

Personally, had someone left such a comment on my site, one calling for jail time for a person not even charged much less convicted, I would feel the need to rebuke that notion.

My grandmother has been in the hospital with pneumonia and heart failure for six days now — I visit her daily. My sister-in-law (and neighbor) went into early labor on Friday, and I’m the first responder for child care for my niece. And my aunt and cousin are coming to visit on Friday because they fear that my grandmother won’t live much longer.

So having to deal with nonsense like people whining about some trackback being delayed by an hour is deeply, deeply stupid. And being accused of supporting somebody’s view because I’ve failed to rebut it is beyond ridiculous. 13,003 comments have been posted on my blog. Some I agree with, some I don’t.

Y’all can fight over the importance of some damned trackback all you want. I’ll be looking after family, which comes first for me. It’s a shame that some folks have different priorities.

I’ve never seen you leave positive or complimentary comments on the sites of other bloggers.

I do so routinely though, more often, I will link to their blog entry from my own blog, as that’s often even more useful to the blogger. I suspect that you and I just read different blogs.

10

Comment by Spank That Donkey

February 8, 2007 @ 3:33 am

Uh, Waldo:
How about you gleefully posting the vandalism of Rep. Goode’s office in a post on your blog?

Waldo says:
“I have been polite, forthright, and honest in every assessment that I’ve made of Rep. Goode and his legal situations, documenting every assertion and engaging in open discussion with those who disagree with me.”

Your only complaint of the vandal was that it was a shame he didn’t match the font up correctly… Yeah, I think you honestly meant to convey to your readers Goode is a ‘bigot’…

Oh, and speaking of engaging in open discussion with those who disagree with me, I got a big fat post, full of your little ditties, just awaiting your attention over at STD…

Here is the address:
http://www.spankthatdonkey.com/spankthatdonkey2/2007/2/6/when-bloggers-seek-to-intimidate.html

11

Comment by Badrose

February 8, 2007 @ 7:39 am

Waldo - I’m glad that you apparently felt comfortable enough to share the details of life “coming at you fast” this week but it really wasn’t necessary. All you had to say was, “family concerns are making me goofy” and I think we’d all relate.

In my opinion, you do an exemplary job of responding to your numerous comments. This is why I was surprised that you didn’t address the suggestion of jail time by Mark Brooks, especially given his position of leadership in the Democratic party.

I haven’t mentioned the issue of missing trackbacks because I don’t have the facts and don’t care to speculate.

We must read some of the same blogs or I wouldn’t have noticed the pattern of wrist slaps . . .

Now go take care of your family - without them, nothing else matters.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>