<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THIS Old Dog Learned a New Trick!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/</link>
	<description>Life, Dogs, Kids and Politics through the eyes of a blonde...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Badrose</title>
		<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Badrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I knew that the entries could be edited, I just didn't know that the editing process was so easy and immediate.  I thought there was a little room full of eggheads that approved the entries before they were published.

Wiki, like any tool, depends on the intent of the user.  If I understand BVBL correctly, (http://www.bvbl.net/?p=720) he appears to be saying it's okay to use Wiki as a political tool, if done correctly.  Like using a butter knife instead of a flathead screwdriver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that the entries could be edited, I just didn&#8217;t know that the editing process was so easy and immediate.  I thought there was a little room full of eggheads that approved the entries before they were published.</p>
<p>Wiki, like any tool, depends on the intent of the user.  If I understand BVBL correctly, (http://www.bvbl.net/?p=720) he appears to be saying it&#8217;s okay to use Wiki as a political tool, if done correctly.  Like using a butter knife instead of a flathead screwdriver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Landers</title>
		<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 03:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I was shocked to find that ANYONE could go in to edit a page&lt;/em&gt;

Shocked? No kidding? Were you really shocked? Do you have any familiarity with what Wikepedia is? The very first words, at the top of their Hope Page, are: "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit."

Along the same lines, I was recently shocked to learn that there was gambling going on at cockfights. Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I was shocked to find that ANYONE could go in to edit a page</em></p>
<p>Shocked? No kidding? Were you really shocked? Do you have any familiarity with what Wikepedia is? The very first words, at the top of their Hope Page, are: &#8220;Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I was recently shocked to learn that there was gambling going on at cockfights. Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWAC Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>SWAC Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/02/14/this-old-dog-learned-a-new-trick/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Sadly, Badrose, what GGD found was not a product of his photoshopping. I was shocked to find that ANYONE could go in to edit a page, and saddened to hear it was being manipulated for political purposes. Which brings to mind the question ... is that considered a part of ethical blogging? I'm glad GGD brought it to light so we can now look for the source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, Badrose, what GGD found was not a product of his photoshopping. I was shocked to find that ANYONE could go in to edit a page, and saddened to hear it was being manipulated for political purposes. Which brings to mind the question &#8230; is that considered a part of ethical blogging? I&#8217;m glad GGD brought it to light so we can now look for the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
