The Story of Two Houses

Filed under: "hmmmmm . . ", National, Things that make me say — Badrose at 7:47 pm on Monday, April 2, 2007

This came in my e-mail bag today:

LOOK OVER THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING
TWO HOUSES AND SEE IF YOU CAN TELL WHICH
BELONGS TO AN ENVIRONMENTALIST.

HOUSE # 1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated by gas. In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or Midwestern “snow belt,” either. It’s in the South.

HOUSE # 2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every “green” feature current home construction can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on the arid high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion) is outside of Nashville,
Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and
filmmaker) Al Gore.

HOUSE # 2 (model eco-friendly house) is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas. Also known as “the Texas White House,” it is the private residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

So whose house is gentler on the environment? Yet another story you WON’T hear on CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC or read about in the New York Times or the Washington Post. Indeed, for Mr. Gore, it’s truly “an inconvenient truth.”

I’ve already verified this at Snopes.  It is TRUE!

4 Comments »

Comment by Genevieve

April 2, 2007 @ 8:26 pm

Badrose: I’ve done some work with the American Diabetes Association about the problems in this country with people being over-weight and obese, and, while I cannot remember the specific numbers right now, there was some research being used at ADA about the toll that being obese takes on the environment, as well as on our financial systems (Medical costs, for example, since obese and overweight people have more medical issues than those at a healthy weight).

Most of it has to do with the extra gas your car takes because of the extra weight, the fact that being overweight messes up how many miles per gallon you get, the amount of cloth used for extra plus sized clothes, and pretty much anything you can think of!

Al Gore is a chunky guy. Bush, while I am not a big fan of his policies, is in excellent physical shape, as is Mrs. Bush (or at least, she appears to be. I remember reading about the President being one of the most physically fit Presidents in history based on his most recent physical somewhere…)

Sorry for my lack of citations, but I don’t really like Al Gore and I thought you’d get a kick out it.

Comment by analog man

April 2, 2007 @ 8:59 pm

I am no fan of Gore’s, but I am a fan of facts.

No doubt the President’s home has a smaller energy footprint — but it’s his second home, so you’d have to count the other house, too.

Also, while every mansion, including Gore’s, consumes more than the average home, at least Gore is using natural gas for heating. A home with natural gas heating, regardless of its size, has a “carbon footprint” 40% smaller than a house of the same size heated by electricity or oil. Gas may be a fossil fuel, but it’s tremendously cleaner and more efficient than one heated by oil or electricity.

Finally, how much of the President’s decision to use “green” building technology has to do with how far off the grid it actually is? And how much energy does he consume in his fossil-fuel buring SUV and truck to get there, so far off the beaten path?

Comment by Kevin

April 10, 2007 @ 1:19 pm

I agree that it is annoying, but from another article:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/gorehome.asp

Shows that even though the envery use is high, it is being off-set by using “green energy sources”. I would like to hear that he at leasts puts some solar panels and a windmill or two out there. Even though he is offsetting, being a spokesman for global warming, he needs to do more

Comment by Jack

April 11, 2007 @ 3:07 pm

‘Only’ 4,000 square feet? Why, it’s practically a postage stamp!

Bravo on the geothermal system, though. There isn’t the same need for a rainwater catch system in Tennessee that there is in Texas but I’m happy to hear that the President is using one regardless.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>