<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Said This?  When?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/</link>
	<description>Life, Dogs, Kids and Politics through the eyes of a blonde...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Likudnic</title>
		<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/#comment-41586</link>
		<dc:creator>Likudnic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/#comment-41586</guid>
		<description>Short, concise and right on the money. No "fleshing out" or "full exploration" required (except for liberals-'nuance', you know).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short, concise and right on the money. No &#8220;fleshing out&#8221; or &#8220;full exploration&#8221; required (except for liberals-&#8217;nuance&#8217;, you know).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Landers</title>
		<link>http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/#comment-41349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badroseblog.com/2007/09/12/who-said-this-when/#comment-41349</guid>
		<description>As a Bull Moose progressive myself, I disagree with the notion that progressives have a shared belief that the Constitution was written for the horse and buggy days. 

That said, you hint at something that I think would make an excellent blog entry if you were to flesh it out more. This idea of 'human rights' being a substitution for 'individual rights' and the implicit notion that those 2 types of rights are in conflict. I would love to see a full exploration of this idea with specific examples.

Offhand, it reminds me a bit of the incompatibility between the ethics of the animal rights movement and the ethics of conservation. At a glance, most would see the 2 as going hand in hand while a more thorough examination reveals total opposition in practical terms. Maybe your human vs. individual rights idea is similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Bull Moose progressive myself, I disagree with the notion that progressives have a shared belief that the Constitution was written for the horse and buggy days. </p>
<p>That said, you hint at something that I think would make an excellent blog entry if you were to flesh it out more. This idea of &#8216;human rights&#8217; being a substitution for &#8216;individual rights&#8217; and the implicit notion that those 2 types of rights are in conflict. I would love to see a full exploration of this idea with specific examples.</p>
<p>Offhand, it reminds me a bit of the incompatibility between the ethics of the animal rights movement and the ethics of conservation. At a glance, most would see the 2 as going hand in hand while a more thorough examination reveals total opposition in practical terms. Maybe your human vs. individual rights idea is similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
