Why I WON’T Be Voting for Fred Thompson

Filed under: National, Personal, family, fun stuff — Badrose at 12:45 pm on Friday, September 28, 2007

notfred.jpeg

Normally, I don’t endorse or support any candidate for the presidency. Namely, because my endorsement is the “kiss of death” to a candidacy (as well as to mutual funds). The last time “my guy” won the White House was 1984 and Ronald Reagan was the incumbent. Even my support couldn’t keep him down.

This year, I’ve quietly been pulling for Fred Dalton Thompson. Two reasons:

1. He entered the race later than the other candidates so there hasn’t been as much time for “the dirt” to come out but primarily because

2. He’s a Dalton. I’m a Dalton. Daltons are good people. Chances are, Fred and I are related because Daltons love to marry other Daltons. My grandfather and Judge Ted Dalton became aware of this when they first met and started tracing their ancestry to see if they were related. Genealogy wasn’t as popular back then and they didn’t have the internet to guide them. Once they realized that Daltons do indeed like to marry other Daltons, they decided to claim each other as kin. That concept has pretty much continued through to the present. If you’re a Dalton, we’ll claim you. And if you’re a Dalton that wants to be president, we’ll support you.

So why, despite our bloodlines, have I decided he won’t get my vote? I’ll gladly tell you - and it’s not pretty. The man dropped me as a friend on facebook. That’s right. Blood is obviously NOT thicker than water when you want to be president. What was my crime? I invited him (Dalton to Dalton) to join the Vote Ham Sandwich for PWC Commonwealth Attorney group. And he dropped me - just like that.

Fred’s obviously fickle and can’t be trusted. One day he’ll say Ahmadinejad looks tacky. The next day you’ll see them suit shopping together at Barneys.

If Fred doesn’t have the courage and conviction to back Ham Sandwich (who has the toughest stance on crime I’ve ever seen** - one I agree with COMPLETELY) then I don’t have the patience to back Fred. I may vote for Ham as a write-in candidate.

Your vote is yours to do with what you will. But remember: Fred dropped me like a bad habit. He’ll drop you, too.

**Ham Sandwich on Criminals:hamsandwich.jpg

* Criminals belong in jail.
* Only people who actually are criminals should be in jail.
* If you’re not a criminal, you should not be in jail.
* If you are a criminal, we should put you in jail.
* Jail is only for criminals.
* If there are criminals who are not in jail, we should find out who and where they are and put them in jail.
* Jail is good, but only for criminals.
* Criminals are bad. They belong in jail.
* Felons belong in jail, too.

5 Comments »

Comment by Mary Rives Brown

September 28, 2007 @ 12:52 pm

I didn’t want to hurt your feelings, but I knew he’d eventually dump you. He broke my heart, too…but I am so over him now. NEXT?

Comment by Rhonda Shearer

September 28, 2007 @ 1:42 pm

Hey you may be quietly pulling for Thompson, but what about Newsweek? They committed to his campaign before there was one…why?

Look at the stats. After you count coverage in Newsweek you suddenly see the special treatment of Thompson. We are a not for profit media ethics program that not only counted the numerous articles on Thompson in Newsweek, but compared their coverage to the other candidates.

We wrote: “Skim the last 12 months of news and you’ll see that no publication has followed Thompson’s political him-hawing like Newsweek. A total of 17 Newsweek articles - including a September cover story - feature Thompson. Meanwhile, the competition is suffering. John McCain’s got 10 articles. Rudy Giuliani’s got 7. The fading Mitt Romney has 6. Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul, a paltry 1. The rest of the major declared candidates ­ Tom Tancredo, Sam Brownback and Duncan Hunter ­ don’t even register on the Fred-philic pages of Newsweek.”

Read more at http://www.stinkyjournalism.org/latest-journalism-news-updates-94.php.

We have also just posted a Thompson answer to the Obama Girl video on You Tube to highlight Newsweek’s Thompson crush . See “My Johnson is for Thompson” featuring the Thompson Twins. Go to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgtLrQijdxo

Comment by A Nelson

September 28, 2007 @ 1:52 pm

Oh give me a break, your so wrong.. #1 Dalton is not his last name as you seem to think it is.. it is his middle name. and #2 he would never be shopping with Mr A of Iran for suits. How can you write this stuff and think people will belive you? You obviously have an issue with him not desiring to go with your company and for good reasons I am sure. Your not voting for him on the reason’s you put up, only shows your a revengeful person. For he is the best candidate for president. And obviously you have no problems with how he stands on the issues, only that he did not go with your company for some reasons you are not stating. He is a good man and will get my vote.

Comment by Badrose

September 28, 2007 @ 4:30 pm

I like the fire in your belly, Nelson. Fred is lucky to have you on board and you should both be glad that I’m no longer supporting him. I haven’t picked a winning presidential candidate in over 20 years! “My guys” have never made it past the South Carolina primary!

Although I refuse to say who WILL get my vote (I don’t want to jinx them) I will say that Newt did not drop me as a friend when I invited him to vote for Ham Sandwich.

Keep up the good fight for Fred!

Comment by Wendi

September 28, 2007 @ 8:25 pm

You’re lucky. We don’t have ham sandwiches up here north of the M-D line. We have lots of balogna and a good bit of deer sausage (it’s gross). But no ham sandwiches to give us hope for the future. Actually, Fred had my vote based on his work on Law and Order. You know me, Badrose. I’m a simple person. If you star on a show that can make me stay up late on a school night, then you must be worth something. Well, if he’s not gonna be around for L&O, then what’s the point of voting for him?! Guess I’ll have to change, too. (BTW, I miss my most favorite Dalton of all!)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>